Freight Market Update May 2026: Stable, But Tightening

At a Glance

• Freight markets remain operational, but conditions are tightening through May.
• Asia–Australia freight rates are firming, particularly across China to Australia East Coast services.
• Effective capacity is being reduced by blank sailings, vessel redeployment and carrier capacity management.
• Fuel and surcharge volatility remain major drivers of total landed cost.
• Schedule reliability has improved, but congestion and transhipment risk remain active.
• Premium direct-call services are attracting stronger demand as importers prioritise reliability.
• Air freight remains useful for urgent cargo, but pricing is increasingly reactive to fuel and disruption.
• Australian importers and exporters should plan earlier, build buffer into timelines and avoid relying only on spot rates.

Why This Freight Market Update Matters

In our main May freight market update, we noted that global freight markets were stabilising after a volatile start to the year.

That remains true.

However, the market has continued to shift through May. Stability is still present, but it is sitting on top of a tighter and more disruption-sensitive operating environment.

The key issue is no longer simply whether freight rates are rising or falling. The more important question is whether the right space, routing and service level can be secured when cargo needs to move.

Across ocean and air freight markets, the same themes are becoming clearer:

• Capacity is being managed more tightly by carriers
• Fuel and surcharge exposure remains active
• Premium services are attracting stronger demand
• Transhipment-heavy routings carry more risk
• Geopolitical disruption continues to influence global network design
• Total landed cost is becoming harder to predict

For Australian importers and exporters, this is a market that needs active management.

The Market Has Moved From Calm to Constrained

The May freight market is not in crisis, but it has become more constrained.

Earlier in the month, the dominant theme was stability. Rates were levelling, capacity was more balanced and the market appeared easier to manage than earlier in the year.

That picture has now become more complicated.

Carrier capacity discipline, blank sailings, longer routing patterns and fuel-related cost pressure are all reducing the amount of reliable capacity available in practice.

This is an important distinction.

There may still be capacity in the market on paper. But that does not always mean the preferred sailing, transit time or service level is available at the required price.

In practical terms, the market is becoming less forgiving.

A late booking, missed sailing or poor routing choice can now create more cost and disruption than it might have only a few weeks earlier.

Asia–Australia Freight Rates Are Firming

The Asia–Australia trade has continued to strengthen through May.

Rates across key China to Australia East Coast services are firming, particularly where importers are seeking more reliable direct-call or premium service options.

This does not appear to be driven by demand alone.

A significant part of the pressure is coming from reduced effective capacity. Blank sailings, vessel redeployment, tighter carrier utilisation and equipment positioning challenges are all contributing to firmer pricing conditions.

The market is also becoming more clearly split between service types.

Lower-cost transhipment services may still be available, but premium direct-call services are attracting stronger demand from importers who are prioritising reliability, space protection and schedule integrity.

That is a major shift.

The market is no longer only competing on base freight rate. It is increasingly competing on confidence.

Effective Capacity Is the Real Issue

One of the most important ideas in the current market is the difference between nominal capacity and effective capacity.

Nominal capacity is the space that appears to exist across the network.

Effective capacity is the space that can actually be used reliably, at the right time, on the right service.

That second measure is becoming more important.

Effective capacity can be reduced by:

• Blank sailings
• Vessel delays
• Port congestion
• Equipment imbalance
• Carrier service changes
• Longer voyage routings
• Cargo rollover
• Transhipment delays
• Vessel redeployment to higher-yield lanes

This is why freight markets can tighten even when demand is not surging.

If carriers remove sailings or consolidate cargo onto fewer vessels, the market becomes tighter regardless of headline demand.

For Australian importers, this means forward planning is now essential. Waiting for the cheapest spot rate can leave cargo exposed to rolled bookings, limited service choice or longer delivery windows.

Reliability Has Improved, But Remains Fragile

Schedule reliability has improved from earlier disruption periods, but the system remains fragile.

The issue is not that cargo is failing to move. The issue is that the network has less flexibility to recover when something goes wrong.

Major Asian export ports and Southeast Asian transhipment hubs remain under pressure. Where cargo relies on relay connections, the risk of missed connections, congestion-related delay or vessel bunching remains active.

This is particularly relevant for Australian importers using transhipment-heavy services into East Coast ports.

A lower freight rate can still be attractive, but the service risk needs to be understood. If cargo is time-sensitive, inventory-critical or linked to a customer delivery deadline, the cheapest routing may not be the best commercial outcome.

In the current environment, freight decisions need to consider:

• Transit time
• Rollover risk
• Carrier reliability
• Port rotation
• Transhipment exposure
• Delivery deadline sensitivity
• Total landed cost

The right answer will not always be the lowest quoted rate.

Fuel and Surcharges Remain a Major Cost Driver

Fuel remains one of the biggest variables in freight cost.

Oil price volatility continues to flow through into ocean freight, air freight and domestic transport. Even when base freight rates look stable, bunker adjustment factors, fuel surcharges and other cost recovery mechanisms can quickly change the final landed cost.

This is especially important in the current environment because geopolitical risk is still affecting energy markets and freight routing.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Short-Term Energy Outlook remains a useful external reference for energy market movements and oil price trends. It provides context around why fuel-related freight cost pressure remains a live issue for importers and exporters.

For Australian businesses, the practical point is simple.

Do not assess freight cost by base rate alone.

The better measure is total landed cost, including freight, fuel, surcharges, inland transport, clearance, storage risk and delivery timing.

Geopolitical Risk Is Still Reshaping Freight Networks

Geopolitical disruption remains one of the strongest forces affecting global freight.

The Red Sea, Strait of Hormuz and broader Middle East risk environment continue to influence how carriers manage routing, insurance, fuel exposure and vessel deployment.

This has a global impact.

Even cargo that does not move directly through a high-risk region can still be affected by the knock-on effects of disruption. When vessels are rerouted, delayed or redeployed, global network efficiency reduces.

That can lead to:

• Longer transit times
• Higher fuel consumption
• Reduced vessel availability
• More expensive routings
• Higher surcharges
• Increased pressure on alternative hubs
• Lower schedule flexibility

This is why global freight conditions can change quickly.

A disruption in one corridor can affect pricing and capacity across trade lanes that seem geographically separate from the original issue.

Global Container Rates Are Showing Renewed Upward Pressure

Global container pricing is also showing signs of renewed upward movement.

Drewry’s World Container Index increased 3% to USD 2,286 per 40ft container in its 7 May 2026 assessment, following three consecutive weekly declines. Drewry attributed the increase to higher rates across Transpacific and Asia–Europe trade lanes.

This matters because global freight indices often provide an early signal of broader rate direction.

Not every lane moves at the same speed. Australia-linked trades have their own local dynamics. But when global indices begin to firm while carriers are also managing capacity more aggressively, it strengthens the case for earlier planning.

The market is not necessarily returning to peak-cycle conditions.

But it is no longer softening in the same way it was.

Air Freight Remains Useful, But Reactive

Air freight remains an important option for urgent, high-value or inventory-critical cargo.

However, it should not be treated as a simple fallback.

Air freight pricing is increasingly sensitive to fuel cost, aircraft routing, bellyhold capacity, e-commerce demand and sea-air conversion activity. When ocean freight becomes less reliable, some cargo shifts toward air or sea-air solutions, placing additional pressure on available capacity.

For Australian importers, inbound air freight from Asia can tighten quickly when demand lifts or fuel costs move sharply.

That means air freight should be used strategically.

It makes sense when the cost of delay is higher than the premium paid for speed. It is less effective when used reactively after poor planning has already created urgency.

What Australian Importers and Exporters Should Do Now

This is a market for active planning.

Australian importers and exporters should avoid assuming that stable conditions earlier in May will continue without pressure.

The priority now should be to protect availability, manage landed cost and reduce avoidable timing risk.

Practical steps include:

• Book earlier where shipment timing is important
• Confirm carrier options before committing to customer delivery dates
• Compare services by reliability, not only rate
• Build buffer into production and delivery timelines
• Monitor surcharge changes closely
• Avoid relying on one routing option
• Use air freight selectively for genuinely urgent cargo
• Review total landed cost before making freight decisions
• Keep logistics partners informed of forward requirements

The businesses that manage this period best will be those that plan before capacity becomes tight, not after.

TFG Global Freight Intelligence

The key message for May is clear.

The freight market is still moving, but it is becoming more constrained.

Rates are firming across several key lanes. Effective capacity is tightening. Fuel and surcharge pressure remains active. Geopolitical risk continues to influence carrier behaviour. Air freight remains available, but reactive and cost-sensitive.

For Australian supply chains, this means freight decisions need to be broader than price alone.

Reliability, routing, timing, surcharge exposure and service quality all need to be considered together.

In this environment, the cheapest freight rate may not deliver the lowest total cost.

Summary for Supply Chain Teams

• Freight markets remain operational, but conditions are tightening.
• Asia–Australia rates are firming through May.
• Effective capacity is being reduced by blank sailings and carrier discipline.
• Fuel and surcharge volatility remain major cost drivers.
• Schedule reliability has improved, but remains fragile.
• Premium services are attracting stronger demand.
• Air freight remains useful, but increasingly reactive.
• Australian importers should plan earlier and avoid relying only on spot pricing.

Conclusion

The May freight market has moved into a more active phase.

The stability seen earlier in the month has not disappeared, but it is now being tested by tighter capacity, firmer rates, fuel volatility and ongoing geopolitical disruption.

For Australian importers and exporters, this is a market that rewards preparation.

The businesses that stay close to their forward requirements, understand their service options and work early with their freight partners will be better placed to control cost and protect delivery timelines.

Stability is still present.

Certainty is not.

—

When it comes to freight forwarding, we are the full package. Market-leading service, values, and solutions.

For all your freight-forwarding solutions, internationally and Australia-wide, you need TFG Global.

Phone: 1300 (693 734) MY FREIGHT | +61 3 9090 7546
Email: andrew@tfgglobal.com.au
Web: www.tfgglobal.com.au

Disclaimer

TFG Global makes reasonable efforts to ensure the information contained in this publication is accurate and current at the time of writing. However, freight markets, carrier operations, regulatory requirements, and supply chain conditions are subject to change and may vary by shipment, trade lane, carrier, port, or service.

This publication may include information sourced from third parties, industry reports, carrier updates, and publicly available data. While TFG Global considers these sources to be reliable, it does not warrant the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of such information, nor does it endorse any third-party views or opinions.

The information provided is general in nature and does not constitute legal, financial, customs, or logistics advice. Nothing in this publication is intended to exclude, restrict, or modify any rights or remedies available under Australian Consumer Law.

To the extent permitted by law, TFG Global disclaims liability for any loss, damage, cost, or expense arising from reliance on this information, whether direct or indirect. Readers should seek advice specific to their circumstances before making freight or supply chain decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions